Tag: Communismist Agenda

Obama’s Past, Present, and Future…

Alinsky

I’ve listened to and read a lot of opinions from people like Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Thomas Sowell, Glenn Beck and many others. People who support Obama will say “owe those guys are a bunch of freaks who don’t know what they are talking about,” yet I can say without any doubt and six years into Obama’s Presidency that 90% of what they predicted actually held true….almost to the letter, while the progressive media, educational and political machine turned out to be maybe 10% correct.

Obama and his family’s ties to self-proclaimed Communist, Socialist, terrorists and even a racist minister made predicting his future policies and beliefs as President fairly easy.

The predictions included:

  • Much higher cost of living.
  • Health insurance industry that will be much higher in cost, lower in quality, produce fewer doctors, and in the end do very little to accomplish what was promised.
  • Disastrous foreign policy.
  • Fewer quality jobs.
  • Relentless attacks on our freedoms…including right to bear arms, religion, privacy, and speech.
  • Massive government spending and growth.
  • Massive increase of social programs dependence.
  • Social and racial division.
  • Utilize Hollywood, education system, and the media to push and protect his agenda.
  • Takeover of the media, which will be used to control and punish those that don’t approve of the administration’s actions/opinions.

It’s not hard to know what someone like Obama is going to do when he admires people who are racist, anti-American, anti-business, pro-government, anti-Constitution, social dividers, political bullies and dictators. When you research the people Obama, his family and friends admired like Saul Alinsky, Karl Marx, Jeremiah Wright, and Malcolm X, you will completely understand where he is coming from and what his future plans/goals are.

Here’s a small list from Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals”-

  • “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)
  • “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” There is no defense. It’s irrational. It’s infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions. (Pretty crude, rude and mean, huh? They want to create anger and fear.)
  • “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.” They’ll keep doing it without urging and come back to do more. They’re doing their thing, and will even suggest better ones. (Radical activists, in this sense, are no different that any other human being. We all avoid “un-fun” activities, and but we revel at and enjoy the ones that work and bring results.)
  • “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.” Don’t become old news. (Even radical activists get bored. So to keep them excited and involved, organizers are constantly coming up with new tactics.)
  • “Keep the pressure on. Never let up.” Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off-balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new. (Attack, attack, attack from all sides, never giving the reeling organization a chance to rest, regroup, recover and re-strategize.)
  • “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
  • “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive.” Violence from the other side can win the public to your side because the public sympathizes with the underdog. (Unions used this tactic. Peaceful [albeit loud] demonstrations during the heyday of unions in the early to mid-20th Century incurred management’s wrath, often in the form of violence that eventually brought public sympathy to their side.)

(more…)

Hare The Dog © 2014 Frontier Theme